WARNING: May contain opinions
Change.org [you may not be aware of this Mr. Huizer] is in my long considered opinion an group to covertly undermine real progressive change [co-op it], so that the 'usual suspects' in the Big Parties can destroy real progressive change and funnel the energy to their own [nefarious] goals. C.org has a long sad track record of co-opting movements such as Occupy - in fact it is their sole purpose, I believe. You may have good intentions, but that organization IMHO, does not...or, you could know what they are all about. I can't assess that. I can assess the track record of sparechange.org., which is not good at real progressive change...only trying to divert such change back to the mainstream [the oligarchy with runs everything and which Occupy challenges].
ActiveSince60s, thank you for your comment. I submit that a controlled opposition (co-op) tactic can only be employed with the use of capital. NGAOTUS does not seek nor accept donations of any kind and thus, the specter of a co-op is unwarranted at this stage of development. Change.org was chosen because it is a Benefit Corporation and it has the appropriate tools needed for our purposes.